Comments on: Experimenting with explicit contracts with Ruby /2016/02/experimenting-with-explicit-contracts-with-ruby/ Plataformatec's place to talk about Ruby, Ruby on Rails, Elixir, and software engineering Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:11:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2 By: Lucas Mazza /2016/02/experimenting-with-explicit-contracts-with-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-1584 Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:11:00 +0000 /?p=5132#comment-1584 In reply to suryart.

Fixed, thanks!

]]> By: suryart /2016/02/experimenting-with-explicit-contracts-with-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-1583 Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:01:00 +0000 /?p=5132#comment-1583 Nice article.
There’s a type though. I think it should be `module Payments` instead of `module Payment` under “Skipping Hash driven development” where you’re creating `Payments::Result` class.

]]> By: Philip Sampaio /2016/02/experimenting-with-explicit-contracts-with-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-1578 Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:17:00 +0000 /?p=5132#comment-1578 Great article, Lucas! Thanks for sharing.

We have a similar gateway integration, and at the beginning of the implementation we ignored the cost of using the “real” implementation in our tests. We had to use mocks/stubs or VCR in a lot of places.

The memory adapter would avoid a lot of pain (with VCR) and repetition (mocks/stubs) in our code.

]]>