Comments on: Small data with Elixir

By: josevalim

josevalim — Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:26:00 +0000

In reply to Matías Reyes. It may or may not be a performance issue. While writing Flow and GenStage itself, I ran only once into a situation which required speeding up and I used the process dictionary in those cases. ETS tables would also have worked though.

By: Matías Reyes

Matías Reyes — Fri, 09 Jun 2017 19:44:00 +0000

This is a great topic! and Flow is amazing!
I have read that immutability has bad performance for data & number crunching. I don’t know if It’s proven, but if it’s true, we should be using ETS tables all over?

By: Tamori Hirofumi

Tamori Hirofumi — Wed, 26 Apr 2017 04:17:00 +0000

In reply to josevalim.

As I told to you at Elixirconf Japan, I translated this blog into Japanese.
http://qiita.com/HirofumiTamori/items/8e076d28ef40d98d99f1
Sorry for late notice. I’m looking forward to your next post.

By: josevalim

josevalim — Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:11:00 +0000

In reply to Tamori Hirofumi. Thank you! I have fixed the example!

By: Tamori Hirofumi

Tamori Hirofumi — Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:41:00 +0000

Hello, it is a quite suggestive post, thanks!
I found the bug in the sample code, File.stream!(“path/to/file”, :line) should be File.stream!(“path/to/file”, [], :line) or File.stream!(“path/to/file”) as stream!/3’s signature is stream!(path, modes \ [], line_or_bytes \ :line).

By: Boshan Sun

Boshan Sun — Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:14:00 +0000

Looking forward to the coming series!